The smart Trick of ejusdem generis case laws That No One is Discussing

The smart Trick of ejusdem generis case laws That No One is Discussing

Blog Article

These provisions utilize to cases where evidence was recorded after the QSO's enforcement, even though the transaction occurred prior to its promulgation. Read more

Official database for searching and viewing federal court dockets and case documents. Compact fees utilize.

Because the Supreme Court could be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has been attained, therefore the decision of the Supreme Court needs to become taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(2) in the Constitution. 10. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more

Sign up for E-mail Notification of recent opinions The cases listed under have had opinions filed for them within the last fourteen times. The following information is available for Every single case: Information Sheet - Click a case number to view case details, together with signing JusticesJudges and participating attorneys.

13 . Const. P. 209/2025 (S.B.) Saifullah Jamali (Disable) V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi After arguing the matter at some length, both parties have agreed for the disposal of the instant petition around the premise that the DIGP Malir will hear the petitioner along with private respondents and will get care of every one of the elements of the case and make certain that no harassment shall be caused to both the parties.

Civil Courts retain jurisdiction over title disputes in partition matters. Agreement to sell does not confer title; it demands legal transfer of title. Agreement to sell must be created and properly exhibited in evidence. Declining relief based on an unproduced and un-exhibited sale agreement is legally unsustainable. Read more

Summaries offer a concise insight into the realm of dispute resolution exterior traditional court proceedings. In Pakistan, arbitration serves as an important alternative for resolving commercial conflicts swiftly and successfully.

168 . H.C.A 203/2016 (D.B.) Saleh Muhammad V/S Faqir Muhammad & others Sindh High Court, Karachi Matter: Appeal At times it's effortless for the Judge to dismiss the suit for non-prosecution, however, a Judge is under the obligation to create an attempt to get rid of a case on merit and more importantly when after recording of evidence it's reached into a stage of final arguments, endeavors should be made for merit disposal when it's arrived at this kind of stage. Read more

The DCFS social worker in charge with the boy’s case experienced the boy made a ward of DCFS, and in her six-month report towards the court, the worker elaborated on the boy’s sexual abuse history, and stated that she planned to maneuver him from a facility into a “more homelike setting.” The court approved her plan.

This Court may possibly interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer in the way inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the method of inquiry or where the conclusion or finding attained with the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. Should the summary or finding is for instance no reasonable person would have ever achieved, the Court may perhaps interfere with the summary or perhaps the finding and mould the relief to make it suitable for the facts of every case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority is definitely the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-appreciate the evidence or maybe the nature of punishment. To the aforesaid proposition, we are fortified via the decision on the Supreme Court during the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Source: Order: Downloads 337 Order Date: 24-JAN-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp

162 . Const. P. 256/2025 (D.B.) Hafeezullah V/S Govt of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It is nicely-settled that the civil servants must first pursue internal appeals within 90 days. In case the appeal is not decided within that timeframe, he/she can then method the service tribunal to challenge the original order. Once they do so, the Tribunal must decide the appeal on merits and cannot merely direct the department to decide it, given that the ninety times for the department to act has already expired. Around the aforesaid proposition, we've been guided via the decision of your Supreme Court while in the case of Dr.

The appellate court determined that the trial court experienced not erred in its decision check here to allow more time for information to be gathered by the parties – specifically regarding the issue of absolute immunity.

171 . Const. P. 1832/2019 (D.B.) Muhammad Fakhar ul Hasnain V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It is effectively established now that the provision for proforma promotion just isn't alien or unfamiliar to your civil servant service composition but it is already embedded in Fundamental Rule 17, wherein it's lucidly enumerated that the appointing authority may possibly if happy that a civil servant who was entitled being promoted from a particular date was, for no fault of his own, wrongfully prevented from rendering service into the Federation/ province in the higher post, direct that this sort of civil servant shall be paid the arrears of pay out and allowances of this kind of higher post through proforma promotion or upgradation arising from the antedated fixation of his/her seniority. Read more

Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming on the main case, It's also a very well-established proposition of regulation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to reach a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence within the Stricto-Sensu, implement to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion acquire support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty from the charge, however, that is matter to your procedure provided under the relevant rules and not otherwise, to the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-value the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings to the evidence.